<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SlashNOT &#187; Netscape</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashnot.com/articles/category/netscape/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashnot.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:24:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Mozilla inconsolable after Apple chooses Konquerer</title>
		<link>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/216/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/216/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netscape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matthew writes: Friends of Mozilla have reported that the browser&#8217;s recent seclusion and binge browsing is due to Apple&#8217;s selection of the Konquerer engine for their Safari web browser. &#8220;I just don&#8217;t know what happened.&#8221; Sobbed an inconsolable Mozilla to close friend NetScape Navigator. &#8220;I mean, things were going so well in the evaluation phase. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="credit"><A HREF="mailto:">Matthew</A> writes: </span><a target="_blank" href="http://www.mozilla.org/">Friends of Mozilla</a> have reported that the browser&#8217;s recent seclusion and binge browsing is due to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.apple.com/no/safari/">Apple&#8217;s selection of the Konquerer engine</a> for their Safari web browser.</p><p> &#8220;I just don&#8217;t know what happened.&#8221; Sobbed an <a target="_blank" href="http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-980492.html">inconsolable Mozilla</a> to close friend <a target="_blank" href="http://www.business2.com/articles/web/print/0,1650,37401,FF.html">NetScape Navigator</a>. &#8220;I mean, things were going so well in the evaluation phase. I&#8217;m so stupid&#8211;I didn&#8217;t even know Apple was testing Konquerer behind my back. What is so wrong with me? I know I&#8217;m <a target="_blank" href="http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-il@NO_SPAMcs.huji.ac.il/msg23633.html">bloated and a bit slower than Konquerer</a>, but I&#8217;ve got real depth and a lot more personality.&#8221;</p><p> When questioned about Mozilla, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.deftone.com/blogzilla/archives/apples_safari_why_not_gecko.html">Apple stated</a> that Mozilla was a great friend and would always be invited to run on the platform, and that Apple was always there to help with compatibility problems. &#8220;Hey, who knows, with the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=1123">serious profiling</a> maybe Mozilla could trim down a bit and we&#8217;d give things a second chance. But for now, we&#8217;re with Konquerer.&#8221;</p><p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/216/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mozilla adds security holes</title>
		<link>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/149/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/149/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2002 02:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netscape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Squid writes: The Mozilla Project, Netscape&#8217;s open-source underdog browser, announced six new security holes today. According to their press release, &#8220;These new security holes should go a long way toward closing the gap between Mozilla and Internet Explorer.&#8221; This is just part of the Mozilla Project&#8217;s plan to become a serious competitor for IE. &#8220;Along [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="credit"><A HREF="mailto:">Squid</A> writes: </span>The <a target="_blank" href="http://www.mozilla.org/">Mozilla Project</a>, Netscape&#8217;s open-source underdog browser, announced <a target="_blank" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/27934.html">six new security holes</a> today. According to their press release, &#8220;These new security holes should go a long way toward closing the gap between Mozilla and <a target="_blank" href="http://sec.greymagic.com/adv/gm012-ie/">Internet Explorer</a>.&#8221;</p><p> This is just part of the Mozilla Project&#8217;s plan to become a serious competitor for IE. &#8220;Along with many more bugs and security flaws, we plan to add features that make it impossible to remove Mozilla from a computer,&#8221; according to a source within the project. Microsoft is not worried: &#8220;Thanks to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.halcyon.com/mclain/ActiveX/welcome.html">ActiveX </a>and a tighter integration with Windows, no software can match the insecurity of Internet Explorer,&#8221; said a Microsoft spokesman. &#8220;Except perhaps <a target="_blank" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/archive/24795.html">IIS</a>.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/149/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brian Wilson hailed as only person to pay retail for browser</title>
		<link>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/114/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/114/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2002 01:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netscape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matthew writes: Brian Wilson, a Pensacola FL resident, was hailed today by the World Wide Web Consortium as the only person to have ever paid retail price for a web browser.  &#8220;Well, It was 1997 I think&#8211;maybe 96. I was in CompUSA, and there was this thing called Netscape Navigator 4 in a box [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><A HREF="">Matthew</A> writes: <i>Brian Wilson, a Pensacola FL resident, was hailed today by the <a href="http://www.w3.org/Amaya/" target="_blank">World Wide Web Consortium</a> as the only person to have ever paid retail price for a web browser. <br /> &#8220;Well, It was 1997 I think&#8211;maybe 96. I was in <a href="http://www.outofthedark.com/CyberPagan/AnotherCompUSA11.html" target="_blank">CompUSA</a>, and there was this thing called <a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1001-207681.html?legacy=cnet" target="_blank">Netscape Navigator 4</a> in a box on the shelf. I looked at the cool wheel and the ship sailing through space, and I thought, damn, this web thingy must be pretty cool. So yeah, I bought it. I paid 69.95. Of course, once I got on I found out that everyone else downloaded it for free or used Internet Explorer, but I was still happy. I&#8217;ve got the manual. Who else has that?&#8221; <br /> &#8220;I also bought NetScape at 135. Ten Shares. Now the lot of them [as converted AOL/Time Warner stock] are worth 1.14. But hey, I&#8217;ve got the stock certificates.&#8221; <br /> <a href="http://www.ibiblio.org/pioneers/andreesen.html" target="_blank">Marc Andreesen</a>, Chief designer of NetScape Navigator and inventor of the <blink>flashing text</blink> HTML tag, thanked Mr. Wilson personally. &#8220;Mr. Wilson, had there been another few hundred million like you, I wouldn&#8217;t have had to sell out.&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/114/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 vs. Mozilla 1.0 Benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/24/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/24/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2002 17:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netscape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Submission by Cpt. Tako  Bob&#8217;s software review&#8217;s contains this report on the performance comparison of the two heavyweight browsers. &#8220;Unfortunately, Mozilla doesn&#8217;t quite make the grade. With pop-ups disabled,  the average browser spent 45 minutes less time browsing for porn, and  frequently could not acheive climax.&#8221;  
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Submission by <A HREF="">Cpt. Tako</A> <P> Bob&#8217;s software review&#8217;s contains this report on the performance comparison of the two heavyweight browsers. &#8220;Unfortunately, Mozilla doesn&#8217;t quite make the grade. With pop-ups disabled, <br /> the average browser spent 45 minutes less time browsing for porn, and <br /> frequently could not acheive climax.&#8221; <br /> </i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/24/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
