<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IKEA and IAEA to merge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashnot.com/articles/392/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/392/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ally</title>
		<link>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/392/#comment-10437</link>
		<dc:creator>Ally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 07:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10437</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Subject:IKEA and IAEA to merge&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can&#039;t wait to see the new ATOM and GEIGER range... do you think they will have it in the Croydon store any time soon????  LOL.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subject:IKEA and IAEA to merge</p>
<p>Can&#039;t wait to see the new ATOM and GEIGER range&#8230; do you think they will have it in the Croydon store any time soon????  LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ds</title>
		<link>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/392/#comment-9977</link>
		<dc:creator>ds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9977</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Subject:the ottoman scandal?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I understand El Baradei&#039;s getting all worked up again about the illicit ottomans allegedly being concealed inside armoires and shipped to Iran.  Iran says the claims are bogus, that the only items they&#039;ve ever transported inside armoires are "little fuzzy chair things without backrests."  Should we be worried?  Does Iran have its sights set on a new Ottoman Empire, or is this just a bunch of hype?  I personally think we should respect the wishes of other nations to obtain small pieces of furniture, particularly leg-rest-oriented furniture.  But maybe I&#039;m just naive.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subject:the ottoman scandal?</p>
<p>I understand El Baradei&#039;s getting all worked up again about the illicit ottomans allegedly being concealed inside armoires and shipped to Iran.  Iran says the claims are bogus, that the only items they&#039;ve ever transported inside armoires are &#8220;little fuzzy chair things without backrests.&#8221;  Should we be worried?  Does Iran have its sights set on a new Ottoman Empire, or is this just a bunch of hype?  I personally think we should respect the wishes of other nations to obtain small pieces of furniture, particularly leg-rest-oriented furniture.  But maybe I&#039;m just naive.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/392/#comment-9962</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2004 23:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9962</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Subject:IKEA founder now richest man&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The founder of IKEA has just surpassed Bill Gates as the world&#039;s richest man, at 53 billion dollars. 
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
Sadly, he won&#039;t be putting any of that money into improving the quality of IKEA&#039;s furniture.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subject:IKEA founder now richest man</p>
<p>The founder of IKEA has just surpassed Bill Gates as the world&#039;s richest man, at 53 billion dollars. </p>
<p>Sadly, he won&#039;t be putting any of that money into improving the quality of IKEA&#039;s furniture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/392/#comment-9956</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2004 16:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9956</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Subject:Re: No Subject Given&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ROFL. Yeah, It was pretty pathetic.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subject:Re: No Subject Given</p>
<p>ROFL. Yeah, It was pretty pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trmj</title>
		<link>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/392/#comment-9952</link>
		<dc:creator>trmj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2004 13:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9952</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Subject:Re: No Subject Given&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s kind of like slashdot on April 1st, but good.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subject:Re: No Subject Given</p>
<p>It&#039;s kind of like slashdot on April 1st, but good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/392/#comment-9949</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2004 04:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9949</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Subject:Re: No Subject Given&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;SlashNOT has a standing policy of being whack. We apologize for the inconvenience.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subject:Re: No Subject Given</p>
<p>SlashNOT has a standing policy of being whack. We apologize for the inconvenience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Hero</title>
		<link>http://www.slashnot.com/articles/392/#comment-9948</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Hero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2004 12:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9948</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Subject:No Subject Given&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So what&#039;s all this about? Is it good or is it whack?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subject:No Subject Given</p>
<p>So what&#039;s all this about? Is it good or is it whack?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
