Comments on: SlashNotes: Report from Comdex 2003 http://www.slashnot.com/articles/322/ Just another WordPress weblog Tue, 6 Jan 2009 22:45:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Michael http://www.slashnot.com/articles/322/#comment-9848 Michael Sat, 22 Nov 2003 02:23:39 +0000 #comment-9848 <p>Subject:Re: David Coursey</p><p>Darn. That's our second Failure to Uphold the Slashdot Tradition this week. We'll have to change the name of the site to SlashNOT or something.</p> Subject:Re: David Coursey

Darn. That's our second Failure to Uphold the Slashdot Tradition this week. We'll have to change the name of the site to SlashNOT or something.

]]> By: Tyson http://www.slashnot.com/articles/322/#comment-9846 Tyson Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:35:40 +0000 #comment-9846 <p>Subject:Re: Dot</p><p>Who said anything about a .? The site is clearly marked /!. The primary tradition here would appear to be making fun of /. stories, so linking to Microsoft-friendly sites is fair game.</p> Subject:Re: Dot

Who said anything about a .? The site is clearly marked /!. The primary tradition here would appear to be making fun of /. stories, so linking to Microsoft-friendly sites is fair game.

]]> By: Java http://www.slashnot.com/articles/322/#comment-9845 Java Fri, 21 Nov 2003 05:01:24 +0000 #comment-9845 <p>Subject:David Coursey</p><p>Great and funny article (samples yo-yos), but linking to this major Microsoft butt kisser is not the slashdot tradition. </p> Subject:David Coursey

Great and funny article (samples yo-yos), but linking to this major Microsoft butt kisser is not the slashdot tradition.

]]>