Comments on: ForwardSlash: Intel cancels Itanium line http://www.slashnot.com/articles/245/ Just another WordPress weblog Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:37:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Michael http://www.slashnot.com/articles/245/#comment-9667 Michael Fri, 28 Feb 2003 03:27:37 +0000 #comment-9667 <p>Subject:Re: More timeline spoilers</p><p>And we'd probably just end up creating an alternate universe where Itanium gets cancelled sooner. Sounds like a boon to that universe anyway.</p> Subject:Re: More timeline spoilers

And we'd probably just end up creating an alternate universe where Itanium gets cancelled sooner. Sounds like a boon to that universe anyway.

]]> By: Matthew http://www.slashnot.com/articles/245/#comment-9666 Matthew Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:57:11 +0000 #comment-9666 <p>Subject:Re: More timeline spoilers</p><p>Just as we don't worry about the scientific accuracy of our polls, so too are we not concerned with the consequences of our manipulations of space-time.</p> Subject:Re: More timeline spoilers

Just as we don't worry about the scientific accuracy of our polls, so too are we not concerned with the consequences of our manipulations of space-time.

]]> By: Tyson http://www.slashnot.com/articles/245/#comment-9665 Tyson Tue, 25 Feb 2003 10:23:22 +0000 #comment-9665 <p>Subject:More timeline spoilers</p><p>Doesn't this mean Intel, after reading /!, will cancel the project early?</p> Subject:More timeline spoilers

Doesn't this mean Intel, after reading /!, will cancel the project early?

]]>