Slashnot’s REAL 2002 predictions revealed

Posted by Squid on Monday January 6, 2003 @05:23AM

from the future-imperfect dept.

SlashNOT

Squid writes: As a disgruntled former SlashNOT editor, I was shocked to read the supposed 2002 predictions recap story. “90% of our predictions came true”. Right. This kind of disregard for proper journalism is exactly why I left SlashNOT and became disgruntled. For everyone’s enjoyment until someone deletes them, here are SlashNOT’s actual predictions from January 2002:

  1. Tablet PCs will become incredibly popular and overtake desktops by the end of 2002.
  2. Kenneth Lay will become the new CEO of Novell, which will then buy out HP.
  3. Intel’s Itanium processor will saturate the server market and make inroads in desktops.
  4. Microsoft will release MS-Linux, a version of Linux that runs over a DOS shell.
  5. Slashdot will reinvent itself as a parody of Slashnot.com.
  6. Amazon.com will tell the press that Segway scooters are one of its top-selling items, despite the fact that they are not yet available for sale.
  7. Our 1000 shares of Pets.com will be worth a fortune.
  8. The US government will outlaw Linux, saying that only terrorists use software they don’t pay for.
  9. The Justice Department will break up Microsoft into two or three smaller companies. One of the new companies will name itself “Bob”.
  10. The Y2K bug will show up three years late at the end of 2002, surprising everyone and causing the destruction of 90% of the world’s computer systems.

4 Comments

  1. Subject:I too am disgruntled

    I too am a disgruntled former editor from slashnot. We should get together and boycott slashnot for not being 100% cruelty free.

    Comment by CaptTako — January 6, 2003 @ 11:31 am

  2. Subject:Re: I too am disgruntled

    Or we could start a PARODY of slashnot!

    Comment by Squid — January 6, 2003 @ 11:48 pm

  3. Subject:Opposite of \”disgruntled\”?

    If you are unhappy you are disgruntled. So does that mean if you are happy, you are … “gruntled”?

    Comment by Anonymous Poster — January 16, 2003 @ 2:41 am

  4. Subject:Re: Opposite of

    Of course. Just the way that I find your comment to be gusting.

    Comment by Matthew — January 16, 2003 @ 10:44 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.